| | 7/22/2021 |
| CR-20-0147-PR | STATE OF ARIZONA v KEYAIRA PORTER | OPINION |
| | John R. Lopez, Author; Robert M. Brutinel, Concur; Ann Scott Timmer, Concur; Clint Bolick, Concur; James P. Beene, Concur; Peter J. Eckerstrom, Concur
|
| | |
|
| | 9/9/2019 |
| CV-18-0275-PR | CITY OF PHOENIX et al v ORBITZ WORLDWIDE et al | OPINION |
| | John R. Lopez, Author; Clint Bolick, Concur; Andrew W. Gould, Concur; Scott Bales, Concur; Peter J. Eckerstrom, Concur; Ann Scott Timmer, Concur in part; Dissent in part; Robert M. Brutinel, Concur in the Dissent
|
| | |
|
| | 1/2/2019 |
| CV-18-0056-PR | STEPHANIE JACKSON v EAGLE ET AL | OPINION |
| | Andrew W. Gould, Author; Scott Bales, Concur; John Pelander, Concur; Ann Scott Timmer, Concur; Clint Bolick, Concur; John R. Lopez, Concur; Peter J. Eckerstrom
|
| | |
|
| | 5/23/2018 |
| CR-17-0193-PR | STATE OF ARIZONA v ANDRE LEE JUWAUN MAESTAS | OPINION |
| | John Pelander, Author; Scott Bales, Concur; Robert M. Brutinel, Concur; Ann Scott Timmer, Concur; John R. Lopez, Concur; Peter J. Eckerstrom, Concur; Clint Bolick, Concur
|
| | Constitutionality Decision
Holding that A.R.S.§ 15-108(A) (2012), which added to the list of locations where possession or use of medical marijuana is prohibited under the Arizona Medical Marijuana Act (Proposition 203 (2010), codified in A.R.S. §§ 36-2801 through -2819), violates the Voter Protection Act, Ariz. Const. art. 4, pt. 1, § 1(6)(C), and is unconstitutional as applied to AMMA-compliant marijuana possession or use. |
|
| | 9/25/2017 |
| CV-16-0259-PR | MARIANNE N. v DCS/O.N./I.T./A.G. | OPINION |
| | Ann Scott Timmer, Author; Scott Bales, Concur; John Pelander, Concur; Robert M. Brutinel, Concur; Peter J. Eckerstrom, Dissent; Clint Bolick, Dissent; Andrew W. Gould, Dissent
|
| | Amended by Order on September 26, 2017.
Constitutionality Decision
Holding that applying Arizona Rule of Juvenile Procedure 64(C) in pretrial proceedings does not conflict with A.R.S. § 8-863(C) in violation of the separation of powers required by the Arizona Constitution, article 3. |
|
| | 5/25/2017 |
| CV-16-0052-PR | THOMAS HORNE/KATHLEEN WINN v SHEILA POLK | OPINION |
| | Clint Bolick, Author; Scott Bales, Concur; John Pelander, Concur; Robert M. Brutinel, Concur; Peter J. Eckerstrom, Concur; Joseph W Howard, Concur; Timothy M Wright, Concur
|
| | |
|
| | 8/19/2016 |
| CV-15-0244-PR | FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE CO v JOHNSON BANK | OPINION |
| | John Pelander, Author; Robert M. Brutinel, Concur; Clint Bolick, Concur; Peter J. Eckerstrom, Concur; Scott Bales, Dissent
|
| | Amended by Order on 8/19/2016. |
|
| | 6/13/2016 |
| CV-15-0244-PR | FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE v JOHNSON BANK | OPINION |
| | John Pelander, Author; Robert M. Brutinel, Concur; Clint Bolick, Concur; Peter J. Eckerstrom, Concur; Scott Bales, Dissent
|
| | PLEASE NOTE: On August 19, 2016, an Order was filed correcting the following sentences:
The second sentence of ¶ 2 of the opinion is amended to read as follows: The policies failed to list certain covenants, conditions, and restrictions (“CC&R's”) that allegedly prohibited commercial development on either parcel.
The first sentence of ¶ 18 of the opinion is amended to read as follows: In any event, the title defect in this case is not an undisclosed lien, but is instead undisclosed CC&R's that allegedly prevented the borrowers/owners from developing the property, which in turn allegedly caused them to default on their loans.
|
PLEASE NOTE: On July 5, 2016, an Order was filed
|
|
|
| | 2/22/2013 |
| CV-12-0211-PR | JAMES C SELL v HON. GAMA/SQUIRE & COMPANY et al | OPINION |
| | John Pelander, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Robert M. Brutinel, Concur; Peter J. Eckerstrom, Concur; Garye L Vasquez, Concur
|
| | |
|
| | 3/13/2009 |
| CV-08-0224-PR | LAURA SEISINGER v SCOTT SIEBEL MD | OPINION |
| | Andrew D. Hurwitz, Author; Peter J. Eckerstrom, Concur in part; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Michael D. Ryan, Concur; Scott Bales, Concur
|
| | |
|