Home 2010 Judicial Performance Reports

2010 Judicial Performance Reports

Court of Appeals Division I Reports
Judge Commission Vote Judicial Report Assignment/Bench Serving Since

Barker, Daniel A.

Full Bio     Decisions

Meets JPR Standards View Appeals Div. I 2001

Brown, Michael J.

Full Bio     Decisions

Meets JPR Standards View Appeals Div. I 2007

Gemmill, John C.

Full Bio     Decisions

Meets JPR Standards View Appeals Div. I 2001

Hall, Philip

Full Bio     Decisions

Meets JPR Standards View Appeals Div. I 2001

Irvine, Patrick

Full Bio     Decisions

Meets JPR Standards View Appeals Div. I 2002

Thompson, Jon W.

Full Bio     Decisions

Meets JPR Standards View Appeals Div. I 1995

Winthrop, Lawrence F.

Full Bio     Decisions

Meets JPR Standards View Appeals Div. I 2002

NOTE:
Judges are evaluated on their judicial performance midway through their term and prior to their retention election. Beginning in 2022, their survey evaluation scores include midterm scores and retention scores. Newly appointed judges serve a two-year term and are evaluated prior to their retention election on their retention scores. The score is the percentage of all evaluators who rated the judge "superior", "very good", or "satisfactory" in each of the Commission's evaluation categories. Depending on the assignment, a judge may not have responses in certain categories, indicated by N/A (for example, some judicial assignments do not require jury trials or no survey responses were returned). The JPR Commission votes "Yes" or "No" on whether a judge "MEETS" Judicial Performance Standards, based on the statistical information, as well as any other information submitted by the public or the judge. Further information on the judges and justices can be found at each court's website.

Back to Top