Case Title |
Case No. |
Additional Information |
State of Arizona v Christopher Michael Montoya |
CR-22-0106-AP |
Oral Argument to be held on 06/13/2024
Case Summary not yet available
|
Lisa Gilpin v Hon. Harris/Marcos Martinez |
CR-23-0252-PR |
Oral Argument to be held on 06/13/2024
Case Summary not yet available
Petition for Review granted on 04/02/2024 as to this rephrased issue:
“Is a victim entitled to restitution when a defendant is adjudged guilty except insane?”
|
San Diego Gas v ADOR, et al. |
CV-23-0283-PR |
Oral Argument to be held on 05/14/2024
Case Summary
Petition for Review granted on 03/05/2024 as to the rephrased issue:
The court of appeals held that in determining the full cash value of all property owned by public utilities, the Arizona Department of Revenue can include the future costs of removing electric transmission and distribution property as accumulated depreciation under A.R.S. § 42-14154. Did the court incorrectly hold that such accumulated depreciation cannot reduce the full cash value of a plant in service to a negative number or offset the value of unrelated property?
Opinion from the Court of Appeals, Division One, Case No. 1CA-TX-21-0008
|
Francisco, et al v Affiliated Urologists, et al |
CV-23-0152-PR |
Oral Argument held on 04/18/2024
Case Summary
Petition for Review granted on 01/09/2024
Memorandum Decision from the Court of Appeals, Division One, Case No. 1CA-CV-21-0701
|
Amy Silverman, et al v ADES |
CV-23-0181-PR |
Oral Argument held on 04/09/2024
Case Summary
Petition for Review granted on 02/06/2024 as to these rephrased issues:
“1. Did the court of appeals err in deciding what qualifies as “bona fide research” under A.R.S. § 46-460(D)(8), which authorizes DES to disclose confidential records about vulnerable adults to a researcher “engaged in bona fide research,” if no personally identifying information is made available?
2. Are there any relevant state or federal constitutional considerations in determining whether journalists are included within the "bona fide research" exception under A.R.S. § 46-460(D)(8)?”
Opinion from the Court of Appeals, Division One, Case No. 1CA-CV-22-0209
|
State of Arizona v Manuel David Perez-Gutierrez |
CR-23-0137-PR |
Oral Argument held on 03/19/2024
Case Summary
Petition for Review granted on 01/09/2024
Opinion from the Court of Appeals, Division One, Case No. 1CA-CR-22-0268
|
Arizona Republican Party v Richter |
CV-23-0208-PR |
Oral Argument held on 03/14/2024 **(OA on the Road- ASU)**
Case Summary
Petition for Review granted on 01/09/2024 as to this rephrased issue: Were the awards of attorney fees by the superior court and the court of appeals appropriate?
Opinion from the Court of Appeals, Division One, Case No. 1CA-CV-21-0201
|
Roaf v Rebuck Consulting, et al |
CV-23-0233-PR |
Oral Argument held on 03/14/2024 **(OA on the Road- ASU)**
Case Summary
Petition for Review granted on 02/06/2024 as to the following rephrased question:
"Did the Court of Appeals err by finding no prejudicial error in allowing Roaf to proceed against Medstar on separate claims of negligent hiring and vicarious liability when Medstar admitted it was vicariously liable for its employee’s negligence and when Roaf is not seeking punitive damages against Medstar?”
Memorandum Decision from the Court of Appeals, Division One, Case No. 1CA-CV-22-0620.
|
Vande Krol v Supersition/Benchmark |
CV-23-0211-PR |
Oral Argument held on 02/13/2024
Case Summary
Petition for Review granted on 12/05/2023 as to this rephrased issue: Whether the Court of Appeals erred in finding that amendments to A.R.S. § 23-901.01 applied to retroactively to the claim of benefits in this case.
Opinion from the Court of Appeals, Division One, Case No. 1CA-IC-22-0046.
|
Mark Gilmore, et al. v Kate Gallego, et al. |
CV-23-0130-PR |
Oral Argument held on 02/13/2024
Case Summary
Petition for Review granted on 10/17/2023 as to these rephrased issues:
1. Does release time violate Petitioners’ free speech, free association, and Right to Work rights?
2. Do the challenged release time provisions violate the Gift Clause?
Opinion from the Court of Appeals, Division One, Case No. 1CA-CV-22-0049
|
Dove Mountain, et al. v. ADOR |
CV-23-0176-PR |
Oral Argument held on 01/23/2024
Case Summary
Petition for Review granted on 11/08/2023, as to these issues:
1. Did the Court of Appeals err when it equated post-tax funds reserved to reimburse the hotel for the cost of future awards to be “gross income” under A.R.S. §§ 42-5070 and -5001(4), (7) when the funds were paid to the hotel upon point redemption?
2. Did the Court of Appeals err when it equated Dove Mountain’s 4.5% remittance to the Marriott rewards program as a payment for membership to a third-party vendor?
3. Did the Court of Appeals err when it decided that Consumers Market did not serve as controlling precedent?
Opinion from the Court of Appeals, Division One, Case No. 1CA-TX-22-0003
|
Rendon Quijada v. Pimienta Dominguez |
CV-23-0160-PR |
Oral Argument held on 01/23/2024
Case Summary
Petition for Review granted on 11/08/2023
Opinion from the Court of Appeals, Division Two, Case No. 2CA-CV-22-0174-FC
|
Satamian v Great Divide et al |
CV-23-0085-PR |
Oral Argument held on 01/16/2024
Case Summary
Petition for Review granted on 08/22/2023, as to issue number two only.
Memorandum Decision from the Court of Appeals, Division One, Case No. 1CA-CV-22-0375
|
State of Arizona v Bennett Laquan Williams |
CR-23-0068-PR |
Oral Argument held on 01/16/2024
Case Summary
Petition for Review granted on 08/22/2023. In addition, the Court asks the parties to address an additional issue. Therefore, the parties should address these issues:
1. Whether the Court of Appeals erred by finding that a plea agreement is void when a marijuana-related conviction that was used to enhance its sentence has been expunged pursuant to A.R.S. § 36-2862.
2. If so, may the State allege a different prior conviction to enhance the sentence?
Opinion from the Court of Appeals, Division One, Case No. 1CA-CR-22-0197 PRPC
|
Mesquite v ADOR |
CV-23-0016-PR |
Oral Argument held on 12/19/2023
Case Summary
Petition for Review granted on 08/22/2023
Opinion from the Court of Appeals, Division One, Case No. 1CA-TX-22-0002
|
Planned Parenthood et al v Kristin Mayes/Hazelrigg |
CV-23-0005-PR |
Oral Argument held on 12/12/2023
Case Summary
Petition for Review granted on 08/22/2023
Opinion from the Court of Appeals, Division Two, Case No. 2CA-CV-22-0116
|
State of Arizona v Kevin Dunbar |
CR-23-0029-PR |
Oral Argument held on 12/12/2023
Case Summary
Petition for Review granted on 08/22/2023
Memorandum Decision from the Court of Appeals, Division Two, Case No. 2CA-CR-21-0069
|
State of Arizona v Larry Dean Anderson |
CR-23-0008-PR |
Oral Argument held on 11/21/2023
Case Summary
Petition for Review granted on 08/22/2023, as to these rephrased issues:
1. Is Anderson’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim based on erroneous advice regarding the availability of parole precluded and untimely considering the extent of confusion in Arizona about the availability of parole after it was abolished?
2. If not, is erroneous advice about the availability of parole objectively unreasonable in light of the extent of confusion in Arizona surrounding the availability of parole?
Memorandum Decision from the Court of Appeals, Division Two, Case No. 2CA-CR-22-0121
|
CAO, et al v PFP Dorsey, et al |
CV-22-0228-PR |
Oral Argument on 11/21/2023
Case Summary
Petition and Cross-Petitions granted in part on 08/22/2023,
as to these rephrased questions:
1. Either on its face or as applied in this case, does A.R.S. § 33-1228 authorize the taking of private property for private use in violation of Article 2, § 17 of the Arizona Constitution?
2. If any common elements or units in a condominium are to be sold pursuant to a condominium termination agreement, does A.R.S. § 33-1228 require all the common elements and units to be part of that sale?
3. If a contract incorporates an unconstitutional statute by reference, are the terms of that statute enforceable as to the contracting parties?
4. If a condominium declaration incorporates a statute by reference, are subsequent statutory amendments incorporated into the agreement?
Opinion from the Court of Appeals, Division One, Case No. 1CA-CV-21-0275
|
San Carlos v State et al/Resolution |
CV-22-0290-PR |
Oral Argument on 11/16/2023 **(OA on the Road- Coconino High School, Flagstaff)**
Case Summary
Petition for Review (Appellee ADEQ) granted on 08/22/2023, as to issues number one and two only.
Opinion from the Court of Appeals, Division One, Case No. 1CA-CV-21-0295
|
State of Arizona v Hon. Cooper/Bassett |
CR-22-0227-PR |
Oral Argument held on 1/10/2023
Case Summary
Petition for Review granted on 11/1/2022
|
State of Arizona v Kevin Harry Moninger |
CR-21-0239-PR |
Oral Argument held on 11/09/2022 **(OA on the Road- U of A, Tucson)**
Case Summary
Petition for Review granted on 08/23/2022
Opinion from the Court of Appeals, Division One, Case No. 1 CA-CR-19-0353
|
Staker & Parson Companies v Scottsdale Insurance Co |
CV-21-0256-CQ |
Oral Argument held on 4/14/2022
Case Summary
Certified Question accepted on 1/4/2022
|
State v Preston Alton Strong |
CR-17-0201-AP |
Oral Argument held on 5/5/2020
Case Summary
|