Skip to main content
Search
Commission on Judicial Conduct
Search
Home
Inside the CJC
About Us
Members
Complaint Form
Frequently Asked Questions
Major Case Summaries
Press Releases
Annual Reports
Rules
Constitution
Commission Rules
Administrative Policies
Arizona Code of Judicial Conduct
Code of Conduct for Judicial Employees
Ethics Committee
Committee Overview
Members
Supreme Court Rule 82
Arizona Code of Judicial Conduct
Code of Conduct for Judicial Employees
Judicial Ethics Advisory Opinions
How to Request an Advisory Opinion
Public Decisions
Frequently Asked Questions
How to File a Complaint
Complaint Form
Judicial Conduct and Ethics Bulletins
Judicial Ethics Advisory Committee
Judicial Ethics Advisory Opinions
Major Case Summaries
Members of the Commission
Public Decisions
Press Releases
Additional Resources
Judicial Performance Review
Center for Judicial Ethics
State Bar of Arizona
Constable Ethics Committee
Home
/
Judicial Ethics Advisory Opinions
/
2002
2002
2002 Judicial Ethics Advisory Opinions
02-01
Judicial Employees' Participation in Civic Life
02-02
Payment of Bar Exam Costs by Law Firm Prior to Judicial Clerkship
02-03
Communications Between Court and Counsel
02-04
Judicial Evaluation of Attorneys
02-05
Disqualification Concerns When the Attorney General's Office Represents Judges
02-06
Ethical Constraints on Lawyers Serving as Pro Tem Limited Jurisdiction Judges
02-07
Municipal Official Serving as Part-Time Pro Tem Judge in Adjoining Jurisdiction
02-08
Judicial Participation in Selection Process for City Prosecutor and Chief of Police
02-09
Propriety of Assigning Defendants to Supervised Probation Provided by Spouse's Company
© 2024 Arizona Supreme Court. All Rights Reserved.